The term "Lazarus" has evolved beyond being a single APT (Advanced Persistent Threat) group into a collection of various subgroups and campaigns. Originally associated with North Korean cyber activities, the term now encompasses multiple entities, complicating understanding due to the proliferation of names used to classify different activities, campaigns, and malware linked to these groups.
Characteristics of Lazarus Subgroups
As the activities have expanded, distinguishing between these subgroups has become increasingly crucial. Security researchers have created a myriad of labels for different components of the Lazarus network, resulting in confusion due to overlapping names and classifications. For instance, certain labels initially designated as attack group names can also describe specific campaigns, creating a complex web of terms. Moreover, multiple security vendors often use different nomenclature for the same groups and sub-groups, further obscuring clarity.
The categorization of Lazarus subgroups includes labels like "TEMP.Hermit," "Selective Pisces," "UNC577," and numerous others that reveal the diverse operations with overlapping tactics, targets, and objectives. This extensive fragmentation highlights the challenge in tracking threat actors and formulating effective countermeasures.
Rationale for Subgroup Identification
Identifying Lazarus subgroups at a granular level is essential for several reasons:
-
Damage Prevention: Understanding subgroups allows for targeted security alerts. Recognizing the specific industries or sectors targeted by different subgroups enables better preparedness and risk mitigation. For instance, if a subgroup focuses on cryptocurrency theft, alerts can be tailored for cryptocurrency businesses, enhancing their defenses.
-
Countermeasures: Accurate identification is vital for analyzing and counteracting the activities of each subgroup. Given that APT groups operate under structured organizations with specific tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), understanding these intricacies is crucial for devising effective strategies to combat their operations.
- Communication to Attackers: By disclosing detailed information about threat actors, organizations can send a message to attackers, illustrating defenders’ capabilities. This communication helps deter attacks by making it more difficult for the perpetrators to exploit their current methodologies.
Case Studies of Overlapping Tactics
A notable trend is the overlap of tactics among different Lazarus subgroups, particularly their methods for recruiting and compromising targets via social networking platforms. For example, multiple subgroups have employed tactics that involve contacting individuals on platforms like LinkedIn, leading them to download malicious software, thus compromising their systems. Cases such as "Moonstone Sleet," "Gleaming Pisces," and the "Contagious Interview" campaign demonstrate how these groups utilize similar approaches to achieve their objectives, such as stealing cryptocurrency or targeting sensitive information.
The emergence of task force-like groups, such as APT43 and Bureau325, which exhibit behaviors and TTPs overlapping with established Lazarus groups, further complicates classification efforts. These entities can operate outside traditional group structures, posing additional challenges for understanding and categorizing cyber threats.
Conclusion
The challenge of tracking and categorizing North Korean APT activities necessitates an understanding beyond simple attribution to state actors. The complexity of identifying individual subgroups enhances the effectiveness of security measures, facilitates targeted prevention efforts, and improves communication regarding cyber threats.
As such, both the private and public sectors must focus on accurate profiling and disclosure of APT group activities, especially as they evolve and adapt over time. The rationale for subgroup analysis extends beyond mere classification; it plays a critical role in preventing significant cyber incidents and reinforcing defenses against increasingly sophisticated cyber threats. Maintaining a clear and organized approach to understanding these subgroups will be vital in countering the ongoing threat posed by Lazarus-associated APTs and related cybercriminal activities.